108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1599
To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Act Reauthorization
Act of 1998 to ensure that adequate funding is provided for certain high intensity
drug trafficking areas.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 3, 2003
Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself and Mr. SOUDER) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition
to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Act Reauthorization
Act of 1998 to ensure that adequate funding is provided for certain high intensity
drug trafficking areas.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Dawson Family Community Protection Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) In the early morning hours of October 16, 2002, the home of Carnell
and Angela Dawson was firebombed in apparent retaliation for Mrs. Dawson's
notification of police about persistent drug distribution activity in their
East Baltimore City neighborhood.
(2) The arson claimed the lives of Mr. and Mrs. Dawson and their 5 young
children, aged 9 to 14.
(3) The horrific murder of the Dawson family is a stark example of domestic
narco-terrorism.
(4) In all phases of counter-narcotics law enforcement--from prevention
to investigation to prosecution to reentry--the voluntary cooperation of
ordinary citizens is a critical component.
(5) Voluntary cooperation is difficult for law enforcement officials to
obtain when citizens feel that cooperation carries the risk of violent retaliation
by illegal drug trafficking organizations and their affiliates.
(6) Public confidence that law enforcement is doing all it can to make communities
safe is a prerequisite for voluntary cooperation among people who may be
subject to intimidation or reprisal (or both).
(7) Witness protection programs are insufficient on their own to provide
security because many individuals and families who strive everyday to make
distressed neighborhoods livable for their children, other relatives, and
neighbors will resist or refuse offers of relocation by local, State, and
Federal prosecutorial agencies and because, moreover, the continued presence
of strong individuals and families is critical to preserving and strengthening
the social fabric in such communities.
(8) Where (as in certain sections of Baltimore City) interstate trafficking
of illegal drugs has severe ancillary local consequences within areas designated
as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas, it is important that supplementary
HIDTA Program funds be committed to support initiatives aimed at making
the affected communities safe for the residents of those communities and
encouraging their cooperation with local, State, and Federal law enforcement
efforts to combat illegal drug trafficking.
SEC. 3. FUNDING FOR CERTAIN HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREAS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 707(d) of the Office of National Drug Control Policy
Act Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1760(d); Public Law 105-277; 112
Stat. 2681-670) is amended--
(1) by striking `The Director' and inserting the following:
`(1) LIMITATION- The Director'; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(2) SPECIFIC PURPOSES- The Director shall ensure that, of the amounts appropriated
for a fiscal year for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program,
at least $1,000,000 is used in high intensity drug trafficking areas with
severe neighborhood safety and illegal drug distribution problems. The funds
shall be used--
`(A) to ensure the safety of neighborhoods and the protection of communities,
including the prevention of the intimidation of potential witnesses of
illegal drug distribution and related activities; and
`(B) to combat illegal drug trafficking through such methods as the Director
considers appropriate, such as establishing or operating (or both) a toll-free
telephone hotline for use by the public to provide information about illegal
drug-related activities.'.
END