108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 276
To repeal section 658 of Public Law 104-208, commonly referred to
as the Lautenberg amendment.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 8, 2003
Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, and Mr. PAUL) introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To repeal section 658 of Public Law 104-208, commonly referred to
as the Lautenberg amendment.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `States' Rights and Second and Tenth Amendment
Restoration Act of 2003'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS:
(1) Domestic Violence remains a very serious problem in the United States.
It is a dangerous crime and should be punished as such, including, where
appropriate, as a felony.
(2) Many States have classified Domestic Violence crimes as misdemeanors,
others as felonies. States are the proper authority, rather than the Federal
Government, to classify Domestic Violence offenses.
(3) Where appropriate, States should classify Domestic Violence offenses
as a felony.
(4) Section 658 of Public Law 104-208, commonly referred to as the Lautenberg
amendment, oversteps Federal authority, violating States' rights, because
no nexus has been shown to exist between Domestic Violence and interstate
commerce.
(5) The Lautenberg amendment does not deal with a subject delegated to Congress
under article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States and
is therefore unconstitutional under the tenth amendment to the Constitution,
as interpreted by United States v. Lopez.
(6) The Lautenberg amendment oversteps Congress's power to regulate commerce
as delineated by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
(7) Some of the strictest gun control laws are found in cities where the
number of incidents of guns being used in violent crimes is the highest.
Therefore, the Lautenberg amendment does not reduce incidents of domestic
violence.
(8) State and Federal judges already have the power to deny persons convicted
of misdemeanors the right to possess firearms as a condition of probation
or parole.
(9) The Lautenberg amendment is an unfunded Federal mandate because States
are liable for the costs of monitoring those citizens who have been banned
for life from owning a firearm. Many times this lifetime ban is a result
of a misdemeanor, not a felony.
(10) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 violates
all notions of constitutional due process and constitutes an ex post facto
law because it imposes a criminal penalty on crimes which were not subject
to that penalty at the time of the Act.
(11) Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals
as many as 2.5 million times every year. Of these self-defense cases, as
many as 200,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual assault.
(12) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will,
if allowed to stand, result in the disarming of millions of citizens, including
women, on account of misdemeanor offenses which, in many cases, were committed
long before the effective date of that Act.
(13) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will,
in many cases, disarm battered women who need access to firearms in order
to protect themselves from their battering spouses as well as from common
criminals.
(14) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will,
if allowed to stand, impose a lifetime gun ban on persons who committed
acts so minor that they were not even entitled to a jury trial prior to
conviction.
(15) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208, will,
if allowed to stand, result in the disarming and dismissal of a significant
number of law enforcement officers and American servicemen, on account of
misdemeanors, which in many cases, were committed long before the effective
date of that Act.
(16) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 ignores
the real problem surrounding domestic violence in that truly violent offenders
are allowed to plea-bargain down to misdemeanors.
(b) PURPOSE- It is the purpose of this Act to restore States' rights, the
tenth amendment, and second amendment freedoms.
SEC. 3. REPEALER.
Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 is repealed
and is null and void as if it had not been enacted, and all provisions of
law amended by such section are restored as if section 658 had not been enacted.
SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect as if included in the Treasury-Postal portion of
Public Law 104-208. Any liability, penalty, or forfeiture incurred by any
person by reason of the application of any amendment made by section 658 of
the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 is hereby extinguished,
and any action or prosecution for the enforcement of any such liability, penalty,
or forfeiture shall not be sustained.
END