109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4119
To strengthen Federal leadership, provide grants, enhance outreach
and guidance, and provide other support to State and local officials to achieve
communications interoperability, to foster improved regional collaboration
and coordination, to promote more efficient utilization of funding devoted
to public safety communications, to promote research and development for first
responder communications, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 20, 2005
Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security,
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee
concerned
A BILL
To strengthen Federal leadership, provide grants, enhance outreach
and guidance, and provide other support to State and local officials to achieve
communications interoperability, to foster improved regional collaboration
and coordination, to promote more efficient utilization of funding devoted
to public safety communications, to promote research and development for first
responder communications, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Improve Interoperable Communications for First
Responders Act of 2005'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) A major barrier to sharing information among police, firefighters, and
others who may be called on to respond to terrorist attacks and other large-scale
emergencies is the lack of interoperable communications systems, which can
enable public safety agencies to talk to one another and share important,
sometimes critical, information in an emergency.
(2) Communications interoperability has been identified by the Department
of Homeland Security as 1 of the most essential capabilities necessary for
first responders to achieve the national preparedness goal the Department
of Homeland Security has established for the Nation.
(3) The lack of interoperability costs lives during terrorist attacks or
natural disasters, but also during everyday emergency operations.
(4) Achieving interoperability is difficult because some 50,000 local agencies
typically make independent decisions about communications systems. This
lack of coordination also dramatically increases the cost of public safety
communications to Federal, State, local, and tribal governments.
(5) Achieving the level of communications interoperability that is needed
will require an unprecedented level of coordination and cooperation among
Federal, State, local, and tribal public safety agencies. Establishing multidisciplinary,
cross-jurisdictional governance structures to achieve the necessary level
of collaboration is essential to accomplishing this goal.
(6) The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requires
the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with other Federal officials,
to establish a program to ensure public safety interoperable communications
at all levels of government.
(7) However, much more remains to be done. For example, in January 2005,
the National Governors Association reported that while achieving interoperability
ranked as the top priority for States, obtaining the equipment and technology
to fulfill this goal remains a challenge. The large majority of States report
that they have not yet achieved interoperability in their States.
(8) Over 70 percent of public safety communications equipment is still analog,
rather than digital. In fact, much of the communications equipment used
by emergency responders is outdated and incompatible, which inhibits communication
between State and local governments and between neighboring local jurisdictions.
Additional grant funding would facilitate the acquisition of new technology
to enable interoperability.
(9) Stronger and more effective national, statewide, and regional leadership
are required to improve interoperability. The Department of Homeland Security
must provide national leadership by conducting nationwide outreach to each
State, fostering the development of regional leadership, and providing substantial
technical assistance to State, local, and tribal public safety officials,
while more effectively utilizing grant programs that fund interoperable
equipment and systems.
(10) The Department of Homeland Security must implement pilot programs and
fund and conduct research to develop and promote adoption of next-generation
solutions for public safety communications. The Department of Homeland Security
must also further develop its own internal expertise to enable it to better
lead national interoperability efforts and to provide technically sound
advice to State and local officials.
(11) Communications interoperability can be accomplished at a much lower
cost if strong national leadership drives cooperation and adoption of smart,
new technology solutions.
SEC. 3. OFFICE FOR INTEROPERABILITY AND COMPATIBILITY.
(a) In General- Section 7303(a)(2) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
`(2) OFFICE FOR INTEROPERABILITY AND COMPATIBILITY-
`(A) ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE- There is established an Office for Interoperability
and Compatibility within the Directorate of Science and Technology of
the Department of Homeland Security to carry out this subsection.
`(B) DIRECTOR- There shall be a Director of the Office for Interoperability
and Compatibility, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security.
`(C) RESPONSIBILITIES- The Director of the Office for Interoperability
and Compatibility shall--
`(i) assist the Secretary of Homeland Security in developing and implementing
the program described in paragraph (1);
`(ii) carry out the Department of Homeland Security's responsibilities
and authorities relating to the SAFECOM Program;
`(iii) carry out section 510 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002; and
`(iv) conduct extensive, nationwide outreach and foster the development
of interoperable communications systems by State, local, and tribal
governments and public safety agencies, and by regional consortia thereof,
by--
`(I) developing, updating, and implementing a national strategy to
achieve communications interoperability, with goals and timetables;
`(II) developing a national architecture, which defines the components
of an interoperable system and how they fit together;
`(III) establishing and maintaining a task force that represents the
broad customer base of State, local, and tribal public safety agencies,
as well as Federal agencies, involved in public safety disciplines
such as law enforcement, firefighting, public health, and disaster
recovery, in order to receive input and coordinate efforts to achieve
communications interoperability;
`(IV) working with the Office of Domestic Preparedness Interoperable
Communication Communications Technical Assistance Program to--
`(aa) provide technical assistance to State, local, and tribal officials;
and
`(bb) facilitate the creation of regional task forces in each State,
with appropriate governance structures and representation from State, local,
and tribal governments and public safety agencies and from the Federal Government,
to effectively address interoperability and other information-sharing needs;
`(V) promoting a greater understanding of the importance of interoperability
and the benefits of sharing resources among all levels of State, local,
tribal, and Federal government;
`(VI) promoting development of standard operating procedures for incident
response and facilitating the sharing of information on best practices
(including from governments abroad) for achieving interoperability;
`(VII) making recommendations to Congress about any changes in Federal
law necessary to remove barriers to achieving communications interoperability;
`(VIII) funding and conducting pilot programs, as necessary, in order
to--
`(aa) evaluate and validate new technology concepts in real-world
environments to achieve public safety communications interoperability;
`(bb) encourage more efficient use of existing resources, including
equipment and spectrum; and
`(cc) test and deploy public safety communications systems that
are less prone to failure, support new non-voice services, consume less spectrum,
and cost less; and
`(IX) performing other functions necessary to achieve communications
interoperability.
`(D) SUFFICIENCY OF RESOURCES- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall
provide the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility with the resources
and staff necessary to carry out the purposes of this section. The Secretary
shall further ensure that there is sufficient staff within the Office
of Interoperability and Compatibility, the Office for Domestic Preparedness,
and other offices of the Department of Homeland Security as necessary,
to provide dedicated support to public safety organizations consistent
with the responsibilities set forth in subparagraph (C)(iv).'.
(b) Definition- Section 7303(g)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(g)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
`(1) INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY- The
terms `interoperable communications' and `communications interoperability'
mean the ability of emergency response providers and relevant Federal, State,
and local government agencies to communicate with each other as necessary,
utilizing information technology systems and radio communications systems,
and to exchange voice, data, or video with one another on demand, in real
time, as necessary.'.
(c) Interoperability Assessment; Report- Title III of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`SEC. 314. INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND REPORT.
`(a) Baseline Assessment- The Secretary, acting through the Director of the
Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, shall conduct a nationwide
assessment to determine the degree to which communications interoperability
has been achieved to date and to ascertain the needs that remain for interoperability
to be achieved.
`(b) Annual Reports- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of
this section, and annually thereafter, the Secretary, acting through the Director
of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, shall submit to the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and
the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report
on the Department's progress in implementing and achieving the goals of the
Improve Interoperable Communications for First Responders Act of 2005. The
first report submitted under this subsection shall include a description of
the findings of the assessment conducted under subsection (a).'.
SEC. 4. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
(a) In General- Title III of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 181
et seq.), as amended by section 3, is further amended by adding at the end
the following:
`SEC. 315. INTEROPERABILITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
`(a) In General- The Secretary shall establish a comprehensive research and
development program to promote communications interoperability among first
responders, including by--
`(1) promoting research on a competitive basis through the Directorate of
Science and Technology Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency;
and
`(2) considering establishment of a Center of Excellence under the Department
of Homeland Security Centers of Excellence Program, using a competitive
process, focused on enhancing information and communications systems for
first responders.
`(b) Purposes- The purposes of the program established under subsection (a)
include--
`(1) understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the diverse public safety
communications systems currently in use;
`(2) examining how current and emerging technology can make public safety
organizations more effective, and how Federal, State, and local agencies
can utilize this technology in a coherent and cost-effective manner;
`(3) exploring Federal, State, and local policies that will move systematically
towards long-term solutions;
`(4) evaluating and validating new technology concepts, and promoting the
deployment of advanced public safety information technologies for interoperability;
and
`(5) advancing the creation of a national strategy to promote interoperability
and efficient use of spectrum in communications systems, improve information
sharing across organizations, and use advanced information technology to
increase the effectiveness of first responders in valuable new ways.'.
(b) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to the funds authorized to
be appropriated by section 7303(a)(3) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(a)(3)), there are authorized to be appropriated
for the operations of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, to
provide technical assistance through the office for Domestic Preparedness,
to fund and conduct research under section 315 of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, and for other appropriate entities within the Department of Homeland
Security to support the activities described in section 7303 of the Intelligence
Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194) and sections 314
and 315 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as added by this Act--
(1) $127,232,000 for fiscal year 2006;
(2) $126,549,000 for fiscal year 2007;
(3) $125,845,000 for fiscal year 2008;
(4) $125,121,000 for fiscal year 2009; and
(5) such sums as may be necessary for each subsequent fiscal year.
SEC. 5. DEDICATED FUNDING TO ACHIEVE INTEROPERABILITY.
The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) is amended by adding
at the end the following:
`TITLE XVIII--DEDICATED FUNDING TO ACHIEVE INTEROPERABILITY
`SEC. 1801. INTEROPERABILITY GRANTS.
`(a) In General- The Secretary, through the Office, shall make grants to States
and eligible regions for initiatives necessary to achieve short-term or long-term
solutions to statewide, regional, national and, where appropriate, international
interoperability.
`(b) Use of Grant Funds- Grants awarded under subsection (a) may be used for
initiatives to achieve short-term or long-term solutions to interoperability
within the State or region and to assist with any aspect of the communication
life cycle, including--
`(1) statewide or regional communications planning;
`(2) system design and engineering;
`(3) procurement and installation of equipment;
`(4) training and exercises; and
`(5) other activities determined by the Secretary to be integral to the
achievement of communications interoperability.
`(c) Coordination- The Secretary shall ensure that the Office coordinates
its activities with Office of Interoperability and Compatibility, the Directorate
of Science and Technology, and other Federal entities so that grants awarded
under this section, and other grant programs related to homeland security,
fulfill the purposes of this Act and facilitate the achievement of communications
interoperability consistent with the national strategy.
`(1) IN GENERAL- A State or eligible region desiring a grant under this
section shall submit an application at such time, in such manner, and accompanied
by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.
`(2) MINIMUM CONTENTS- At a minimum, each application submitted under paragraph
(1) shall--
`(A) identify the critical aspects of the communications life cycle, including
planning, system design and engineering, procurement and installation,
and training for which funding is requested;
`(i) the proposed use of funds would be consistent with and address
the goals in any applicable State homeland security plan, and, unless
the Secretary determines otherwise, are consistent with the national
strategy and architecture; and
`(ii) the applicant intends to spend funds under the grant, to administer
such funds, and to allocate such funds among any participating local
governments; and
`(C) be consistent with the Interoperable Communications Plan required
by section 7303(f) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(f)).
`(e) State Review and Submission-
`(1) IN GENERAL- To ensure consistency with State homeland security plans,
an eligible region applying for a grant under this section shall submit
its application to each State within which any part of the eligible region
is located for review before submission of such application to the Secretary.
`(2) DEADLINE- Not later than 30 days after receiving an application from
an eligible region under paragraph (1), each such State shall transmit the
application to the Secretary.
`(3) STATE DISAGREEMENT- If the Governor of any such State determines that
a regional application is inconsistent with the State homeland security
plan of that State, or otherwise does not support the application, the Governor
shall--
`(A) notify the Secretary in writing of that fact; and
`(B) provide an explanation of the reasons for not supporting the application
at the time of transmission of the application.
`(1) CONSIDERATIONS- In approving applications and awarding grants under
this section, the Secretary shall consider--
`(A) the nature of the threat to the State or eligible region;
`(B) the location, risk, or vulnerability of critical infrastructure and
key national assets, including the consequences from an attack on critical
infrastructure in nearby jurisdictions;
`(C) the size of the population, as well as the population density of
the area, that will be served by the interoperable communications systems,
except that the Secretary shall not establish a minimum population requirement
that would disqualify from consideration an area that otherwise faces
significant threats, vulnerabilities, or consequences;
`(D) the extent to which grants will be utilized to implement interoperability
solutions--
`(i) consistent with the national strategy and compatible with the national
architecture; and
`(ii) more efficient and cost effective than current approaches;
`(E) the number of jurisdictions within regions participating in the development
of interoperable communications systems, including the extent to which
the application includes all incorporated municipalities, counties, parishes,
and tribal governments within the State or eligible region, and their
coordination with Federal and State agencies;
`(F) the extent to which a grant would expedite the achievement of interoperability
in the State or eligible region with Federal, State, and local agencies;
`(G) the extent to which a State or eligible region, given its financial
capability, demonstrates its commitment to expeditiously achieving communications
interoperability by supplementing Federal funds with non-Federal funds;
`(H) whether the State or eligible region is on or near an international
border;
`(I) the extent to which geographic barriers pose unusual obstacles to
achieving communications interoperability; and
`(J) the threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences faced by the State
or eligible region related to at-risk site or activities in nearby jurisdictions,
including the need to respond to terrorist attacks arising in those jurisdictions.
`(A) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall establish a review panel under section
871(a) to assist in reviewing grant applications under this section.
`(B) RECOMMENDATIONS- The review panel established under subparagraph
(A) shall make recommendations to the Secretary regarding applications
for grants under this section.
`(C) MEMBERSHIP- The review panel established under subparagraph (A) shall
include individuals with technical expertise in communications interoperability
as well as emergency response providers and other relevant State and local
officials.
`(3) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS- Any grant funds awarded that may be used to
support interoperability shall, as the Secretary may determine, remain available
for up to 3 years, consistent with section 7303(e) of the Intelligence Reform
and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(e)).
`(A) IN GENERAL- In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary
shall ensure that each State receives, for each fiscal year, the greater
of--
`(i) 0.55 percent of the amounts appropriated for grants under this
section; or
`(ii) the eligible State's sliding scale baseline allocation of 28.62
percent of the amounts appropriated for grants under this section.
`(B) OTHER ENTITIES- Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall
ensure that for each fiscal year--
`(i) the District of Columbia receives 0.55 percent of the amounts appropriated
for grants under this section;
`(ii) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico receives 0.35 percent of the amounts
appropriated for grants under this section; and
`(iii) American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana islands,
Guam, and the Virgin Islands each receive 0.055 percent of the amounts
appropriated for grants under this section.
`(C) POSSESSIONS- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), no possession
of the United States shall receive a baseline distribution under subparagraph
(A).
`(g) Definitions- As used in this section, the following definitions apply:
`(1) ELIGIBLE REGION- The term `eligible region' means--
`(A) 2 or more contiguous incorporated municipalities, counties, parishes,
Indian tribes or other general purpose jurisdictions that--
`(i) have joined together to enhance communications interoperability
between first responders in those jurisdictions and with State and Federal
officials; and
`(ii) includes the largest city in any metropolitan statistical area,
as defined by the Office of Management and Budget; or
`(B) any other area the Secretary determines to be consistent with the
definition of a region in the national preparedness guidance issued under
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8.
`(2) INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY- The
terms `interoperable communications' and `communications interoperability'
mean the ability of emergency response providers and relevant Federal, State,
and local government agencies to communicate with each other as necessary,
utilizing information technology systems and radio communications systems,
and to exchange voice, data, or video with one another on demand, in real
time, as necessary.
`(3) OFFICE- The term `office' refers to the Office of Domestic Preparedness
of the Office of State and Local Government Preparedness and Coordination
within the Department of Homeland Security.
`(4) SLIDING SCALE BASELINE ALLOCATION- The term `sliding scale baseline
allocation' means 0.0001 multiplied by the sum of--
`(A) the value of a State's population relative to that of the most populous
of the 50 States of the United States, where the population of such States
has been normalized to a maximum value of 100; and
`(B) 1/4 of the value of a State's population density relative to that
of the most densely populated of the 50 States of the United States, where
the population density of such States has been normalized to a maximum
value of 100.
`(h) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated
to carry out the purposes of this section--
`(1) $400,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;
`(2) $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;
`(3) $600,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;
`(4) $800,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;
`(5) $1,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and
`(6) such sums as may be necessary for each subsequent fiscal year.'.
SEC. 6. TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.
The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(6 U.S.C. 101) is amended--
(1) by inserting after the item relating to section 313 the following new
item:
`Sec. 314. Interoperability assessment and report.'
(2) by adding at the end the following new item:
`TITLE XVIII--DEDICATED FUNDING TO ACHIEVE INTEROPERABILITY
`Sec. 1801. Interoperability grants.'.
SEC. 7. SOURCE OF FUNDS.
Amounts appropriated to carry out this Act shall be made available from funds
available for--
(1) reeducations in the Millennium Challenge Account;
(2) the Export-Import Bank;
(3) the Overseas Private Investment Corporation; and
(4) the International Trade Administration.
SEC. 8. TERMINATION.
This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall terminate on the date that
is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
END