109th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1956
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to create a new
three-tiered approval system for drugs, biological products, and devices that
is responsive to the needs of seriously ill patients, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
November 3, 2005
Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor,
and Pensions
A BILL
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to create a new
three-tiered approval system for drugs, biological products, and devices that
is responsive to the needs of seriously ill patients, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Access, Compassion, Care, and Ethics for Seriously
Ill Patients Act' or the `ACCESS Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The necessity of placebo controlled studies has been questioned on both
scientific and ethical grounds for seriously ill patients.
(2) The current standards of the Food and Drug Administration for approval
of drugs, biological products, and devices deny the benefits of medical
progress to seriously ill patients who face morbidity or death from their
disease.
(3) Promising therapies intended to treat serious or life threatening conditions
or diseases and which address unmet medical needs have received unjustified
delays and denials of approval.
(4) Seriously ill patients have a right to access available investigational
drugs, biological products, and devices.
(5) The current Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute
case-by-case exception for compassionate access must be required to permit
all seriously ill patients access to available experimental therapies as
a treatment option.
(6) The current emphasis on statistical analysis of clinical information
needs to be balanced by a greater reliance on clinical evaluation of this
information.
(7) Food and Drug Administration advisory committees should have greater
representation of medical clinicians who represent the interests of seriously
ill patients in early access to promising investigational therapies.
(8) The use of available investigational products for treatment is the responsibility
of the physician and the patient.
(9) The use of combinations of available investigational and approved products
for treatment is the responsibility of the physician and the patient.
(10) The development and approval of drugs, biological products, and devices
intended to address serious or life-threatening conditions or diseases is
often delayed by the inability of sponsors to obtain prompt meetings with
the Food and Drug Administration and to obtain prompt resolution of scientific
and regulatory issues related to the investigation and review of new technologies.
SEC. 3. TIERED APPROVAL SYSTEM FOR DRUGS, BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, AND DEVICES.
Section 506 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 356) is
amended to read as follows:
`SEC. 506. TIERED APPROVAL SYSTEM.
`(a) In General- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the sponsor of
an investigational drug, biological product, or device may submit an application
to the Secretary for Tier I or Tier II approval in accordance with this section.
`(A) APPLICATION CONTENT- A sponsor of an investigational drug, biological
product, or device applying for Tier I approval of the product shall submit
to the Secretary an application as described under section 505(b)(1) or
505(b)(2), section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act, or section
510(k) or 515(c)(1), as applicable, which shall contain--
`(i) data and information from completed Phase I clinical investigations
and any other nonclinical or clinical investigations;
`(ii) preliminary evidence that the product may be effective against
a serious or life-threatening condition or disease, which evidence may
be based on uncontrolled data such as case histories, information about
the pharmacological mechanism of action, data from animal and computer
models, comparison with historical data, or other preliminary information,
and may be based on a small number of patients; and
`(iii) an assurance that the sponsor will continue clinical investigation
to obtain Tier III approval.
`(B) LIMITATION- Tier I approval shall be primarily based upon clinical
evaluation, not statistical analysis.
`(2) DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY-
`(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 30 days after the receipt of an application
for Tier I approval, the Secretary shall either--
`(i) approve the application; or
`(ii) refer the application to the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee.
`(B) RECOMMENDATION- Within 90 days after receipt of an application for
approval, the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee shall issue a recommendation
to the Secretary on whether the Secretary should approve the application.
`(C) FINAL DECISION- Within 30 days after receipt of the recommendation
from the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee, the Secretary shall
either approve the application or shall issue an order setting forth a
detailed explanation of the reasons why the application was not approved
and the specific data that the sponsor must provide so that the application
may be approved.
`(3) APPEAL- If the Secretary does not approve an application for which
the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee recommended approval, the sponsor
of the application shall have the right to appeal the decision to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs. The Commissioner shall provide the sponsor with a hearing
within 30 days following the nonapproval of the application and shall issue
an order within 30 days following the hearing either concurring in the nonapproval
or approving the application. The Commissioner shall not delegate the responsibility
described in this paragraph to any other person.
`(4) CRITERIA- In making a determination under paragraph (2), the Secretary
shall consider whether the totality of the information available to the
Secretary regarding the safety and effectiveness of an investigational drug,
biological product, or device, as compared to the risk of morbidity or death
from a condition or disease, indicates that a patient (who may be representative
of a small patient subpopulation) may obtain more benefit than risk if treated
with the drug, biological product, or device. If the potential risk to a
patient of the condition or disease outweighs the potential risk of the
product, and the product may possibly provide benefit to the patient, the
Secretary shall approve the application.
`(5) PRODUCT LABELING- The labeling approved by the Secretary for the drug,
biological product, or device--
`(A) shall state that the product is intended for use by a patient whose
physician has documented in writing that the patient has--
`(i) exhausted all treatment options approved by Secretary for the condition
or disease for which the patient is a reasonable candidate; and
`(ii) unsuccessfully sought treatment, or obtained treatment that was
not effective, with an investigational drug, biological product, or
device for which such individual is a reasonable candidate (which may
include consideration of the lack of a source of supply or geographic
factors); and
`(B) shall state that every patient to whom the product is administered
shall, as a mandatory condition of receiving the product, provide--
`(i) written informed consent, as described under part 50 of title 21,
Code of Federal Regulations;
`(ii) a written waiver of the right to sue the manufacturer or sponsor
of the drug, biological product, or device, or the physicians who prescribed
the product or the institution where it was administered, for an adverse
event caused by the product, which shall be binding in every State and
Federal court; and
`(iii) consent for the manufacturer of the product to obtain data and
information about the patient and the patient's use of the product that
may be used to support an application for Tier II or Tier III approval.
`(6) LIMITATION ON CONDITIONS- Tier I approval may be subject to the requirement
that the sponsor conduct appropriate post-approval studies.
`(1) IN GENERAL- A sponsor of an investigational drug, biological product,
or device applying for Tier II approval shall submit to the Secretary an
application as described under section 505(b)(1) or 505(b)(2), section 351(a)
of the Public Health Service Act, or section 510(k) or 515(c)(1), as applicable,
which shall contain--
`(A) data and information that the drug, biological product, or device
has an effect on a clinical endpoint or on a surrogate endpoint or biomarker
that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit to a patient (who
may be representative of a small patient subpopulation) suffering from
a serious or life-threatening condition or disease; and
`(B) an assurance that the sponsor will continue clinical investigation
to obtain Tier III approval.
`(2) DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY-
`(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 30 days after the receipt of an application
for Tier II approval, the Secretary shall either--
`(i) approve the application; or
`(ii) refer the application to the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee.
`(B) RECOMMENDATION- Within 90 days after receipt of an application for
approval, the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee shall issue a recommendation
to the Secretary on whether the Secretary should approve the application.
`(C) FINAL DECISION- Within 30 days after receipt of the recommendation
from the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee, the Secretary shall
either approve the application or issue an order setting forth a detailed
explanation of the reasons why the application was not approved and the
specific data that the sponsor must provide so that the application may
be approved.
`(3) APPEAL- If the Secretary does not approve an application for which
the Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee recommended approval, the sponsor
of the application shall have the right to appeal the decision to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs. The Commissioner shall provide the sponsor with a hearing
within 30 days following the nonapproval of the application and shall issue
an order within 30 days following the hearing either concurring in the nonapproval
or approving the application. The Commissioner shall not delegate the responsibility
described in this paragraph to any other person.
`(4) LIMITATION ON CONDITIONS-
`(A) POST-APPROVAL STUDIES- Tier II approval may be subject to the requirement
that the sponsor conduct appropriate post-approval studies to validate
the surrogate endpoint or biomarker or otherwise confirm the effect on
the clinical endpoint.
`(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this subsection shall be construed
to permit the Secretary to condition Tier II approval on compliance with
any other standards, including any standard necessary to meet Tier III
approval.
`(d) Tier III Approval- For purposes of this Act, the term `Tier III approval'
means--
`(1) with respect to a new drug or new biological product, approval of such
drug or product under section 505(b)(1) or 505(b)(2) or section 351 of the
Public Health Service Act, as the case may be; and
`(2) with respect to a new device, clearance of such device under section
510(k) or approval of such device under section 515(c)(1).
`(e) Promotional Materials- Approval of a product under either Tier I or II
may be subject to the requirements that--
`(1) the sponsor submit copies of all advertising and promotional materials
related to the product during the preapproval review period and, following
approval and for such period thereafter as the Secretary determines to be
appropriate, and at least 30 days prior to the dissemination of the materials;
`(2) all advertising and promotional materials prominently disclose the
limited approval for the product and data available supporting the safety
and effectiveness of the product; and
`(3) the sponsor shall not disseminate advertising or promotional material
prior to obtaining written notification from the Secretary that the advertising
or promotional material complies with this subchapter.
`(f) Expedited Withdrawal of Approval- The Secretary may withdraw Tier I or
Tier II approval using expedited procedures (as prescribed by the Secretary
in regulations which shall include an opportunity for a hearing) if--
`(1) the sponsor fails to conduct post-approval studies with due diligence,
considering all of the circumstances involved;
`(2) a post-approval study fails to verify clinical benefit of the product
for even a small patient subpopulation;
`(3) other evidence demonstrates that the product is not safe or effective
under the conditions of use for even a small patient subpopulation; or
`(4) the sponsor disseminates false or misleading promotional materials
with respect to the product and fails to correct the material promptly after
written notice from the Secretary.
`(g) Accelerated Approval Advisory Committee-
`(1) IN GENERAL- In order to facilitate the development and expedite the
review of drugs, biological products, and devices intended to treat serious
or life threatening conditions, the Secretary shall establish the Accelerated
Approval Advisory Committee.
`(2) DELEGATION- The Secretary may delegate authority for the Accelerated
Approval Advisory Committee to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs. The Accelerated
Approval Advisory Committee shall be staffed and administered in the Office
of the Commissioner.
`(A) IN GENERAL- The Committee shall be composed of 11 voting members,
including 1 chairperson and 5 permanent members each of whom shall serve
a term of 3 years and may be reappointed for a second 3-year term, and
5 nonpermanent members who shall be appointed to the Committee for a specific
meeting, or part of a meeting, in order to provide adequate expertise
in the subject being reviewed. The Committee shall include as voting members
no less than 2 representatives of patient interests, of which 1 shall
be a permanent member of the Committee. The Committee shall include as
nonvoting members a representative of interests of the drug, biological
product, and device industry.
`(B) APPOINTMENTS- The Secretary shall appoint to the Committee persons
who are qualified by training and experience to evaluate the safety and
effectiveness of the types of products to be referred to the Committee
and who, to the extent feasible, possess skill in the use of, or experience
in the development, manufacture, or utilization of, such products. The
Secretary shall make appointments to the Committee so that the Committee
shall consist of members with adequately diversified expertise and practical
experience in such fields as clinical medicine, biological and physical
sciences, and other related professions. Scientific, industry, and consumer
organizations and members of the public shall be afforded an opportunity
to nominate individuals for appointment to the Committee. No individual
who is in the regular full-time employ of the United States and engaged
in the administration of this chapter may be a member of the Committee.
`(4) COMPENSATION- Committee members, while attending meetings or conferences
of the Committee or otherwise engaged in its business, shall be entitled
to receive compensation at rates to be fixed by the Secretary, but not at
rates exceeding the daily equivalent of the rate in effect for grade GS-18
of the General Schedule, for each day so engaged, including traveltime,
and while so serving away from their homes or regular places of business
each member may be allowed travel expenses (including per diem in lieu of
subsistence) as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, for persons in the
Government service employed intermittently.
`(5) ASSISTANCE- The Secretary shall furnish the Committee with adequate
clerical and other necessary assistance.
`(6) ANNUAL TRAINING- The Secretary shall employ nongovernmental experts
to provide annual training to the Committee on the statutory and regulatory
standards for product approval.
`(7) TIMELINE- The Committee shall be scheduled to meet at such times as
may be appropriate for the Secretary to meet applicable statutory deadlines.
`(A) OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTERESTED PERSONS- Any person whose product is
specifically the subject of review by the Committee shall have--
`(i) the same access to data and information submitted to the Committee
as the Secretary;
`(ii) the opportunity to submit, for review by the Committee, data or
information, which shall be submitted to the Secretary for prompt transmittal
to the Committee; and
`(iii) the same opportunity as the Secretary to participate in meetings
of the Committee.
`(B) ADEQUATE TIME; FREE AND OPEN PARTICIPATION- Any meetings of the Committee
shall provide adequate time for initial presentations and for response
to any differing views by persons whose products are specifically the
subject of the Committee review, and shall encourage free and open participation
by all interested persons.
`(C) SUMMARIES- At all meetings of the Committee, the Secretary shall
provide a summary to the Committee of all Tier I and Tier II applications
that the Committee did not consider that were approved by the Secretary
since the last meeting of the Committee.
`(h) Commencement of Review- If the Secretary determines, after preliminary
evaluation of the data and information submitted by the sponsor, that the
product may be effective, the Secretary shall evaluate for filing, and may
commence review of portions of, an application for Tier I or Tier II approval
before the sponsor submits a complete application. The Secretary shall commence
such review only if the applicant provides a schedule for submission of information
necessary to make the application complete.
`(i) Inapplicability of Provisions- The following provisions shall not apply
to Tier I or Tier II applications and approvals:
`(1) Chapter VII, subchapter C, parts 2 and 3 relating to fees for drugs,
biological products, and devices.
`(2) The provisions of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration
Act of 1984 that authorize approval of abbreviated new drug applications
and applications submitted under section 505(b)(2). Market exclusivity and
patent term restoration of Tier I and Tier II approved drugs, biological
products, and devices shall be determined solely at the time of Tier III
approval without regard to prior Tier I or Tier II approval. Prior to Tier
III approval, the Secretary shall not approve any application submitted
under section 505(b)(2) or section 505(j) that references a drug approved
under subsections (b) or (c) of this section.'.
SEC. 4. ETHICS IN HUMAN TESTING.
Chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 351 et seq.)
is amended by adding at the end of section 505(i) the following:
`(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall prohibit
placebo-only or no-treatment-only concurrent controls in any clinical investigation
conducted under this chapter or, in the use of the last-observation-carried-forward
convention, in any clinical investigation conducted under this chapter or
section 351 of the Public Health Service Act with respect to any life-threatening
condition or disease where reasonably effective approved alternative therapies
exist for the specific indication.'.
SEC. 5. EXPANDED ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS AND DEVICES.
(a) In General- Chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 351 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end of section 561 the following:
`(f) Expanded Access Program- The Food and Drug Administration shall establish
a new program to expand access to investigational treatments for individuals
with serious or life threatening conditions and diseases. In carrying out
this expanded access program, the Secretary shall publish and broadly disseminate
written guidance that--
`(1) describes such expanded access programs for investigational drugs,
biological products, and devices intended to treat serious or life-threatening
conditions or diseases;
`(2) encourages and facilitates submission of Tier I and Tier II applications
and approvals; and
`(3) facilitates the provision of investigational drugs and devices to seriously
ill individuals without unreasonable delay by recognizing that the use of
available investigational products for treatment is the responsibility of
the physician and the patient.
`(g) Implementation of Expanded Access Programs-
`(1) TRAINING OF PERSONNEL- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment
of this subsection, the Secretary shall implement training programs at the
Food and Drug Administration with respect to the expanded access programs
established under this section.
`(2) POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDANCE- The Secretary shall establish
policies, regulations, and guidance designed to most directly benefit seriously
ill patients.
`(h) Development of Surrogate Endpoints and Biomarkers- The Secretary shall--
`(1) establish a program to encourage the development of surrogate endpoints
and biomarkers that are reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit for
serious or life-threatening conditions for which there exist significant
unmet medical needs;
`(2) request the Institute of Medicine to undertake a study to identify
validated surrogate endpoints and biomarkers, and recommend research to
validate surrogate endpoints and biomarkers, that may support approvals
for products intended for the treatment of serious or life-threatening conditions
or diseases; and
`(3) make widely available to the public a list of drugs, biological products,
and devices that are being investigated for serious or life-threatening
conditions or diseases and that have not yet received Tier I or Tier II
approval for marketing.'.
(b) Conforming Amendment- Section 561(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act is amended by striking the heading and inserting `Expanded Access to Investigational
Drugs and Devices for Seriously Ill Patients'.
SEC. 6. MODERNIZATION OF THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.
Subchapter E of chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 360bbb et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`SEC. 565. POLICIES RELATED TO STUDY EVALUATION INFORMATION.
`(1) NONSTATISTICAL MEASURES- The Secretary shall give equal weight to clinical
judgment and statistical analysis in the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness
of drugs, biological products, and devices, and shall not disapprove a product
application solely on the basis of a statistical analysis or the rigid use
of the 95 percent confidence level convention. This policy shall apply--
`(A) in evaluating clinical study designs and endpoints; and
`(B) in making decisions with respect to product applications.
`(2) TYPES OF NONSTATISTICAL MEASURES- The policy established under paragraph
(1), for the purposes described in such paragraph--
`(A) shall include but not be limited to such nonstatistical information
as--
`(i) clinical evaluation information, such as case history reports;
`(ii) scientific and clinical studies designed to measure or define
mechanisms of action or molecular targeting;
`(iii) data from animal and computer models; and
`(iv) comparison with historical data; and
`(B) shall incorporate the use of--
`(i) evaluations of the adverse effect of delaying the availability
of an investigational drug to even a small subpopulation of seriously
ill patients; and
`(ii) scientific, observational, or clinical studies designed and conducted
to collect well-documented information.
`(b) Meetings- A meeting to address any pending scientific, medical, regulatory,
or other issue relating to the development, investigation, review, or other
aspect of a drug, biological product, or device shall ordinarily be held within
15 days of the receipt of a written request for the meeting by the sponsor
of the product, which may be extended to 30 days for good cause. Such meetings
shall ordinarily be conducted in person, but may be conducted by telephone
or other form of communication if both parties agree. In order to reduce the
burden of meetings, only those Food and Drug Administration employees who
are intended to actively participate in the discussion shall attend a meeting.
Minutes of a meeting shall be promptly prepared and exchanged by both parties
immediately following the meeting and shall accurately summarize what occurred
at the meeting
`(c) Rule of Construction- The provisions of chapter V and section 351 of
the Public Health Service Act shall be construed to incorporate the policy
established in this section.'.
SEC. 7. MEMBERSHIP OF ONCOLOGY DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Membership of the Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration
shall consist of no less than 2 patient representatives who are voting members
of the committee.
END