109th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2317
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to require the United States Trade
Representative to identify trade enforcement priorities and to take action
with respect to priority foreign country trade practices, and for other
purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 16, 2006
Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. HATCH, and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
A BILL
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to require the United States Trade
Representative to identify trade enforcement priorities and to take action
with respect to priority foreign country trade practices, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Trade Competitiveness Act of 2006'.
SEC. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF TRADE ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES.
(a) In General- Title III of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411 et seq.)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
`SEC. 311. IDENTIFICATION OF TRADE ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES.
`(a) Identification and Annual Report-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Within 75 days after the submission of the report required
by section 181(b), the United States Trade Representative shall annually--
`(A) identify United States trade enforcement priorities;
`(B) identify enforcement actions that the Trade Representative has
taken during the previous year and review the impact these enforcement
actions have had in addressing foreign trade barriers;
`(C) identify priority foreign country trade practices on which the
Trade Representative will focus its enforcement efforts; and
`(D) submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee
on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and publish in the
Federal Register a report on the priorities, actions, and practices
identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).
`(2) FACTORS TO CONSIDER- In identifying priority foreign country trade
practices under paragraph (1), the Trade Representative shall focus on
those practices, the elimination of which is likely to have the most significant
potential to increase United States economic growth, either directly or
through the establishment of a beneficial precedent. The Trade Representative
shall take into account all relevant factors, including--
`(A) the major barriers and trade distorting practices described in
the most recent available National Trade Estimate Report required under
section 181(b);
`(B) the findings and practices described in the most recent available
report required under--
`(ii) section 1377 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988;
`(iii) section 3005 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988;
`(iv) section 421 of the Act entitled `An Act to authorize extension
of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment)
to the People's Republic of China, and to establish a framework for
relations between the United States and the People's Republic of China'
(22 U.S.C. 6951); and
`(v) any other report prepared by the Trade Representative or any
other agency relating to international trade and investment;
`(C) the trade agreements to which a foreign country is a party and
its compliance with those agreements;
`(D) the medium- and long-term implications of foreign government procurement
plans; and
`(E) the international competitive position and export potential of
United States products and services.
`(3) OTHER ITEMS IN REPORT- The Trade Representative may include in the
report a description of foreign country trade practices that may in the
future warrant identification as a priority foreign country trade practice.
`(4) PRIORITIES NOT IDENTIFIED- If the Trade Representative does not identify
a priority foreign country trade practice in the report required under
paragraph (1), the Trade Representative shall set out in detail in that
report the reasons for failing to do so.
`(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 45 days after the submission of the report
required by section 181(b), the Trade Representative shall consult with
the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means
of the House of Representatives with respect to the priorities, actions,
and practices to be identified in the report under subsection (a).
`(2) VOTE OF COMMITTEE- If, as a result of the consultations described
in paragraph (1), either the Committee on Finance of the Senate or the
Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives requests identification
of a priority foreign country trade practice by majority vote of either
Committee, the Trade Representative shall include such identification
in its annual report.
`(3) DETERMINATION NOT TO INCLUDE PRIORITY FOREIGN COUNTRY TRADE PRACTICES-
The Trade Representative may determine not to include the priority foreign
country trade practice requested under paragraph (2) in its annual report
only if the Trade Representative finds that--
`(A) such practice is already being addressed under provisions of United
States trade law, under the Uruguay Round Agreements (as defined in
section 2(7) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(7))),
under any bilateral or regional trade agreement, or as part of trade
negotiations with that foreign country or other countries, and progress
is being made toward the elimination of such practice; or
`(B) identification of such practice as a priority foreign country trade
practice would be contrary to the interests of United States trade policy.
`(4) REASONS FOR DETERMINATION- In the case of a determination made pursuant
to paragraph (3), the Trade Representative shall set forth in detail the
reasons for that determination in the report required under subsection
(a)(1).
`(c) Investigation and Resolution-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Upon submission of the report required by subsection
(a), the Trade Representative shall, with respect to any priority foreign
country trade practice identified, seek satisfactory resolution with the
country concerned under the auspices of the World Trade Organization,
pursuant to a bilateral or regional trade agreement to which the United
States is a party, or by any other means. A satisfactory resolution may
include elimination of the practice or, if not feasible, providing for
compensatory trade benefits.
`(2) CONSULTATIONS; INVESTIGATIONS- Not later than 120 days after the
transmission of the report required under subsection (a), the Trade Representative
shall, with respect to any priority foreign country trade practice identified--
`(A) initiate dispute settlement consultations in the World Trade Organization;
`(B) initiate dispute settlement consultations under the applicable
provisions of any bilateral or regional trade agreement to which the
United States is a party;
`(C) initiate an investigation under section 302(b)(1) of this Act;
`(D) seek to negotiate an agreement that provides for the elimination
of the priority foreign country trade practice or, if elimination of
the practice is not feasible, an agreement that provides for compensatory
trade benefits; or
`(E) take any additional action necessary to eliminate the priority
foreign country trade practice.
`(3) REPORT- On the day the Trade Representative takes action under subparagraph
(E) of paragraph (2), the Trade Representative shall transmit to Congress
a report describing the action and the reasons for taking the actions.
If the Trade Representative takes action under subparagraph (E) of paragraph
(2), the Trade Representative shall state in detail the reasons the Trade
Representative did not take action under subparagraphs (A) through (D)
of such paragraph.
`(d) Additional Reporting- The Trade Representative shall report to the
Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of
the House of Representatives every 6 months on the progress being made to
realize the trade enforcement priorities identified in subsection (a)(1)(A)
and the steps being taken to address the priority foreign country trade
practices identified in subsection (a)(1)(C).'.
(b) Conforming Amendment- The table of contents for the Trade Act of 1974
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 310, the following
new item:
`Sec. 311. Identification of trade enforcement priorities.'.
SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF CHIEF TRADE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
(a) Establishment of Position- Section 141(b)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974
(19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
`(2) There shall be in the Office 3 Deputy United States Trade Representatives,
1 Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and 1 Chief Trade Enforcement Officer.
The 3 Deputy United States Trade Representatives, the Chief Agricultural
Negotiator, and the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer shall be appointed
by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. As
an exercise of the rulemaking of the Senate, any nomination of a Deputy
United States Trade Representative, the Chief Agricultural Negotiator,
or the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer submitted to the Senate for its
advice and consent, and referred to a committee, shall be referred to
the Committee on Finance. Each Deputy United States Trade Representative,
the Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer
shall hold office at the pleasure of the President and shall have the
rank of Ambassador.'.
(b) Functions of Position- Section 141(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2171(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(6) The principal function of the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer shall
be to ensure that United States trading partners comply with trade agreements
to which the United States is a party. The Chief Trade Enforcement Officer
shall assist the United States Trade Representative in investigating and
prosecuting disputes before the World Trade Organization, and pursuant
to other trade agreements to which the United States is a party, and shall
assist the United States Trade Representative in carrying out the Trade
Representative's functions under subsection (d). The Chief Trade Enforcement
Officer shall make recommendations with respect to the administration
of United States trade laws relating to foreign government barriers to
United States goods, services, intellectual property, government procurement,
and other trade matters. The Chief Trade Enforcement Officer shall perform
such other functions as the United States Trade Representative may direct.'.
(c) Compensation- Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended
by inserting `Chief Trade Enforcement Officer' as a new item after `Negotiator'.
SEC. 4. TRADE ENFORCEMENT WORKING GROUP.
(a) Establishment- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall establish an interagency
Trade Enforcement Working Group (in this section referred to as the `Working
Group') which shall be chaired by the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer of
the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
(b) Membership- The Working Group shall include representatives from the
Departments of Commerce, State Treasury, Agriculture, and such other departments
and agencies as the United States Trade Representative considers appropriate.
(c) Responsibility- It shall be the responsibility of the Working Group
to assist the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer in carrying out the principle
functions described in section 141(c)(6) of the Trade Act of 1974.
SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING EXCHANGE RATES AND IMF REFORM.
(a) Findings- The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The global economy today is characterized by massive imbalances that
risk substantial disruption to global economic growth.
(2) The United States current account deficit is at the heart of these
global economic imbalances, predicted to reach $800,000,000,000 in 2005.
(3) A current account deficit of this size is unsustainable and threatens
the global economy with disruption and recession.
(4) Policies to manipulate exchange rates help drive global economic imbalances
and the United States current account deficit.
(5) Asian central banks appear to manipulate their currency through protracted,
large-scale intervention in currency markets, largely concentrated in
United States dollar assets.
(6) The policies of Asian central banks keep Asian currencies from appreciating
meaningfully against the dollar.
(7) Protracted, large-scale intervention in international currency markets
runs counter to Article IV, section 1, paragraph (iii) of the International
Monetary Fund Articles of Agreement and the General Principles governing
the Article as adopted by the International Monetary Fund Executive Board.
(8) A principal function of the International Monetary Fund is to monitor
exchange rate regimes and to act to prevent sustained currency market
manipulation like that seen today in Asia.
(9) The United States is the largest shareholder in the International
Monetary Fund and is therefore best positioned to urge the International
Monetary Fund to enforce its provisions on exchange rate policies.
(10) The Department of the Treasury has to date not been successful in
urging the International Monetary Fund to enforce Article IV, section
1, paragraph (iii) of the International Monetary Fund Articles of Agreement.
(b) Sense of the Congress-
(1) EXCHANGE RATE INTERVENTION- It is the sense of the Congress that--
(A) the President should instruct the United States Executive Director
to the International Monetary Fund to request the Managing Director
of the Fund to use more aggressively the Fund's power to request consultations
with any member country regarding that country's exchange rate policies.
The purpose of the consultations is to determine, and recommend remedial
action (if necessary), in a transparent manner--
(i) the extent of a country's direct or indirect intervention in currency
markets for purposes contrary to the Articles of Agreement of the
International Monetary Fund;
(ii) the effects of the intervention on the value of the currencies
on member countries; and
(iii) the effects of the interventions on international economic imbalances;
and
(B) the President should instruct the United States Executive Director
to the International Monetary Fund to propose that the International
Monetary Fund issue a semi-annual report on exchange rate policies that
addresses all cases of large-scale intervention in international currency
markets, determines the effect of these interventions on exchange rates,
and proposes remedial action to curtail such practices.
(2) REFORM OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND- It is the sense of the
Congress that the President should support efforts to reform the International
Monetary Fund to facilitate greater vigilance over global exchange rates,
and to ensure the governance structure of the International Monetary Fund
represents the global economy, by instructing the United States Executive
Director to the International Monetary Fund to--
(A) lead a sustained and cooperative effort to reform the International
Monetary Fund Executive Board to better represent large emerging economies,
including those in Asia;
(B) lead a sustained and cooperative effort to reform the weighted votes
of Member States to better represent the significance of large emerging
economies, including those in Asia; and
(C) lead a comprehensive effort to review and improve the transparency
of the International Monetary Fund, including publication of member
country data and information related to exchange rate policies.
SEC. 6. INFORMATION AND ADVICE FROM PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS.
Section 135 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (B);
(B) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting
`; and'; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
`(D) preventing the loss of Federal and State sovereignty in the negotiation,
implementation, and enforcement of a trade agreement.';
(2) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the following:
`(E) The prevention of the loss of Federal and State sovereignty during
the negotiation, implementation, and enforcement of trade agreements.';
(3) in subsection (e)(1), in the first sentence, by inserting before the
end period the following: `, including an assessment of the effect of
the trade agreement on Federal and State sovereignty and the extent to
which State and local governments were consulted in the negotiation of
the free trade agreement'; and
(4) in subsection (e)(2), after `United States', by inserting the following:
`, maintains Federal and State sovereignty,'.
SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING SOVEREIGNTY.
(a) Findings- The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) America's economic growth and prosperity is best served by embracing
strategies to open fair global markets, investing in innovative research
and technologies that create the industries and jobs, and engaging in,
rather than being isolated from, the challenges of international competition
in an increasingly interconnected world.
(2) The overall negotiating objectives of our Nation in negotiating trade
agreements and treaties includes economic growth, employment creation,
sustainable development, and improvements to living standards and market
opportunities.
(3) Another primary responsibility of the United States Government is
to ensure that Federal and State laws are not usurped by foreign governments
or organizations.
(4) A World Trade Organization (WTO) panel recently concluded that United
States prohibitions on Internet gambling violate the United States commitments
under the WTO. Specifically, the panel found that Federal and State gambling
laws of the United States that prohibit companies located in Antigua and
Barbuda from providing Internet gambling services to United States consumers
conflict with international trade obligations under the General agreement
on Trade in Services (GATS).
(b) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) in addition to the overall trade negotiating objectives of the United
States relating to economic growth, employment creation, sustainable development,
and improvement to living standards and market opportunities, the United
States policy should be to prevent the loss of Federal and State sovereignty
in the negotiation, implementation, and enforcement of any trade agreement;
and
(2) laws that State and local governments have validly adopted, that are
constitutional, and that reflect locally appropriate responses to the
needs of State and local governments and residents, should not be overridden
by provisions in trade agreements.
SEC. 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriate $5,000,000 to the United States Trade
Representative to carry out the provisions of this Act.
END