110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 553
To require the Secretary of the Army to operate and maintain
as a system the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 18, 2007
Mrs. BIGGERT (for herself, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. GUTIERREZ,
Mr. LEVIN, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. PETRI, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HIGGINS,
Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. KIRK, Mr. WALSH of New York, Ms. SLAUGHTER,
Mr. KILDEE, Mr. CAMP of Michigan, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. STUPAK,
Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. UPTON, Mr. EMANUEL, and Mr.
MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To require the Secretary of the Army to operate and maintain
as a system the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Great Lakes Asian Carp Barrier Act'.
SEC. 2. CONSOLIDATION OF BARRIER PROJECTS.
(a) In General- The Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier
Project (referred to in this section as `Barrier I') (as in existence
on the date of enactment of this Act), constructed as a demonstration
project under section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance
Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and the project
relating to the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, authorized
by section 345 of the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public
Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352) (referred to in this section as `Barrier
II'), shall be considered to constitute a single project.
(b) Activities Relating to Barrier I and Barrier II-
(1) DUTIES OF SECRETARY OF THE ARMY- The Secretary of the Army, at Federal
expense, shall--
(A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
(B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the project cooperation
agreement with the State of Illinois dated June 14, 2005;
(C) operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier II as a system to optimize
effectiveness;
(D) conduct, in consultation with appropriate Federal, State, local,
and nongovernmental entities, a study of a range of options and technologies
for reducing impacts of hazards that may reduce the efficacy of the
Barriers; and
(E) provide to each State a credit in an amount equal to the amount
of funds contributed by the State toward Barrier II.
(2) APPLICATION OF CREDIT- A State may apply a credit received under
paragraph (1)(E) to any cost-sharing responsibility for an existing
or future Federal project with the Corps of Engineers in the State.
(c) Feasibility Study- The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate
Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall conduct, at
Federal expense, a feasibility study of the range of options and technologies
available to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species between the
Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins through the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal and other aquatic pathways.
(d) Conforming Amendment- Section 345 of the District of Columbia Appropriations
Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352) is amended to read as follows:
`Sec. 345. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be
necessary to carry out the Barrier II project of the project for the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, Illinois, initiated pursuant
to section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
2309a).'.
END