S 2978
110th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2978
To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to make technical corrections
to the definition of willful noncompliance with respect to violations
involving the printing of an expiration date on certain credit and debit
card receipts before the date of the enactment of this Act.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 6, 2008
Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
A BILL
To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to make technical corrections
to the definition of willful noncompliance with respect to violations
involving the printing of an expiration date on certain credit and debit
card receipts before the date of the enactment of this Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Credit and Debit Card Receipt Clarification
Act of 2008'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE.
(a) Findings- The Congress finds as follows:
(1) The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (commonly referred
to as `FACTA') was enacted into law in 2003 and one of the purposes
of such Act is to prevent criminals from obtaining access to consumers'
private financial and credit information in order to reduce identity
theft and credit card fraud.
(2) As part of that law, the Congress enacted a requirement, through
an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, that no person that
accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business
shall print more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the
expiration date upon any receipt provided to the card holder at the
point of the sale or transaction.
(3) Many merchants understood that this requirement would be satisfied
by truncating the account number down to the last 5 digits based in
part on the language of the provision as well as the publicity in
the aftermath of the passage of the law.
(4) Almost immediately after the deadline for compliance passed, hundreds
of lawsuits were filed alleging that the failure to remove the expiration
date was a willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act even
where the account number was properly truncated.
(5) None of these lawsuits contained an allegation of harm to any
consumer's identity.
(6) Experts in the field agree that proper truncation of the card
number, by itself as required by the amendment made by the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act, regardless of the inclusion of the
expiration date, prevents a potential fraudster from perpetrating
identity theft or credit card fraud.
(7) Despite repeatedly being denied class certification, the continued
appealing and filing of these lawsuits represents a significant burden
on the hundreds of companies that have been sued and could well raise
prices to consumers without corresponding consumer protection benefit.
(b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to ensure that consumers suffering
from any actual harm to their credit or identity are protected while
simultaneously limiting abusive lawsuits that do not protect consumers
but only result in increased cost to business and potentially increased
prices to consumers.
SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF WILLFUL NONCOMPLIANCE FOR ACTIONS BEFORE
THE DATE OF THE ENACTMENT OF THIS ACT.
(a) In General- Section 616 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681n) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(d) Clarification of Willful Noncompliance- For the purposes of this
section, any person who printed an expiration date on any receipt provided
to a consumer cardholder at a point of sale or transaction between December
4, 2004, and the date of the enactment of this subsection but otherwise
complied with the requirements of section 605(g) for such receipt shall
not be in willful noncompliance with section 605(g) by reason of printing
such expiration date on the receipt.'.
(b) Scope of Application- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall
apply to any action, other than an action which has become final, that
is brought for a violation of 605(g) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
to which such amendment applies without regard to whether such action
is brought before or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
END