106th CONGRESS
1st Session
Separation of Powers Restoration Act
H. R.
2655
To restore the separation of powers
between the Congress and the President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 30, 1999
Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. METCALF)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committees on the
Judiciary, and Rules, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration
of such provisions
as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To restore the separation of powers between the
Congress and the President.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Separation of Powers Restoration
Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) As a limit on governmental power, Constitutional
framers vested Federal powers in three coequal branches of government, each
with unique and limited powers and each with a coequal duty to uphold and
sustain the Constitution of the United States.
(2) A Supreme Court justice stated, `The doctrine of
the separation of powers was adopted by the convention of 1787 not to promote
efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was
not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to
the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save
the people from autocracy.' Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 293 (1926)
(Brandeis, J., dissenting).
(3) James Madison, quoting Montesquieu, stated in Federalist
47, `There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are
united in the same person, or body of magistrates.'
(4) Article I of the Constitution provides, `All legislative
powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.'
(5) A congressional committee print has noted that,
`[b]ecause the President has no power or authority over individual citizens
and their rights except where he is granted such power and authority by a
provision in the Constitution or by statute, the President's proclamations
are not legally binding and are at best hortatory unless based on such grants
of authority.' 85th Cong., 1st Sess., Executive Orders and Proclamations:
A Study of a Use of Presidential Powers (Comm. Print 1957).
(6) The Supreme Court has stated that, even if Presidents
have, without congressional authority, taken actions only the Congress may
take, `Congress has not thereby lost its exclusive constitutional authority
to make laws necessary and proper to carry out the powers vested by the Constitution
`in the Government of the United States, or any Department of Officer thereof.'
(Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)).
(7) Treaties or Executive Agreements which purport to
assign powers not amongst those specifically granted to the Federal Government
by the Constitution are non-binding and cannot constitute law.
SEC. 3. SEPARATION OF POWERS RESTORING RESCISSIONS.
(a) REPEAL OF WAR POWERS RESOLUTION- The War Powers Resolution
(50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) is repealed.
(b) TERMINATION OF STATES OF EMERGENCY-
(1) IN GENERAL- All powers and authorities possessed
by the President, any other officer or employee of the Federal Government,
or any executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 5) as a result
of the existence of any declaration of national emergency in effect on the
date of enactment of this Act are terminated 90 days after such date. Such
termination shall not affect--
(A) any action taken or proceeding pending not finally
concluded or determined on such date;
(B) any action or proceeding based on any act committed
prior to such date; or
(C) any rights or duties that matured or penalties
that were incurred prior to such date.
(2) DEFINITION- For the purpose of this subsection,
the term `national emergency' means a general declaration of emergency made
by the President or any other officer or employee of the executive branch.
(d) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO DECLARE EMERGENCY- To
the extent that any Act of Congress in effect on the date of enactment of this
Act grants to the President or any other officer or employee of the executive
branch the power to declare a national emergency, such power is hereby divested
to the Congress alone.
SEC. 4. REQUIREMENT OF STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR PRESIDENTIAL
ORDERS.
(a) STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY- The President shall include
with each Presidential order a statement of the specific statutory or constitutional
provision which in fact grants the President the authority claimed for such
action.
(b) INVALIDITY OF NONCONFORMING ORDERS- A Presidential
order which does not include the statement required by subsection (a) is invalid,
to the extent such Presidential order is issued under authority granted by a
congressional enactment.
SEC. 5. EFFECT OF PRESIDENTIAL ORDERS.
(a) LIMITED EFFECT OF PRESIDENTIAL ORDERS- A Presidential
order neither constitutes nor has the force of law and is limited in its application
and effect to the executive branch.
(b) EXCEPTIONS- Subsection (a) does not apply to--
(1) a reprieve or pardon for an offense against the
United States, except in cases of impeachment;
(2) an order given to military personnel pursuant to
duties specifically related to actions taken as Commander in Chief of the
Armed Forces; or
(3) a Presidential order citing the specific congressional
enactment relied upon for the authority exercised in such order and--
(A) issued pursuant to such authority;
(B) commensurate with the limit imposed by the plain
language of such authority; and
(C) not issued pursuant to a ratified or unratified
treaty or bilateral or multilateral agreement which--
(i) violates the ninth or tenth amendments to the
Constitution; or
(ii) makes a delegation of power to a foreign government
or international body when no such delegating authority exists under the
Constitution.
SEC. 6. STANDING TO CHALLENGE PRESIDENTIAL ORDERS WHICH
IMPACT SEPARATION OF POWERS INTEGRITY.
The following persons may bring an action in an appropriate
United States court to challenge the validity of any Presidential order which
exceeds the power granted to the President by the relevant authorizing statute
or the Constitution:
(1) CONGRESS AND ITS MEMBERS- The House of Representatives,
the Senate, any Senator, and any Representative to the House of Representatives,
if the challenged Presidential order--
(A) infringes on any power of Congress;
(B) exceeds any power granted by a congressional enactment;
or
(C) violates section 4 because it does not state the
statutory authority which in fact grants the President the power claimed
for the action taken in such Presidential order.
(2) STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS- The highest governmental
official of any State, commonwealth, district, territory, or possession of
the United States, or any political subdivision thereof, or the designee of
such person, if the challenged Presidential order infringes on the powers
afforded to the States under the Constitution.
(3) AGGRIEVED PERSONS- Any person aggrieved in a liberty
or property interest adversely affected directly by the challenged Presidential
order.
SEC. 7. DEFINITION OF PRESIDENTIAL ORDER.
In this Act, the term `Presidential order' means--
(1) any Executive order, Presidential proclamation,
or Presidential directive; and
(2) any other Presidential or Executive action by whatever
name described purporting to have normative effect outside the executive branch
which is issued under the authority of the President or any other officer
or employee of the executive branch.
END
