108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3398
To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a goods movement
program to improve the productivity, security, and safety of freight transportation
gateways.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 29, 2003
Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
A BILL
To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a goods movement
program to improve the productivity, security, and safety of freight transportation
gateways.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Goods Movement Act of 2003'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Growth in international trade has become increasingly important to the
welfare of the domestic economy and economic security, as demonstrated by
the fact that between 1970 and 1999 the share of the United States gross
domestic product accounted for by trade in goods and services grew from
10.7 percent to 26.9 percent.
(2) Increased growth in international trade places a disproportionate demand
on our surface transportation infrastructure concentrated in our major international
gateways, metropolitan and urban centers, and trade corridors, resulting
in a high concentration of freight traffic relative to total vehicle movement
and growing congestion which is adversely affecting regional mobility, safety,
security, and environmental quality in affected communities and the reliability
and sustainability of our national transportation system and the global
connectivity underpinning our national economy.
(3) In the decades coinciding with completion of the national defense highway
and rail systems, the population of the United States has grown by 40 percent
since 1970, the number of registered vehicles has increased by 100 percent,
and in concentrated areas trade-generated truck traffic has grown at double-digit
compounded rates while road capacity has increased by only 6 percent.
(4) Continued explosive growth in international trade puts increasing pressure
on public and private infrastructure, particularly at global gateways, to
increase throughput velocity, and fuels national and regional demand for
additional surface transportation infrastructure at the Federal, State,
and local levels, and will require collaborative initiatives among system
users to maximize the use of existing capacity, adopt best industry practices,
and plan and finance system improvements driven by goods movement demand.
(5) Comprehending the nature, and systematically calculating and measuring
the dimensions, of this trade-generated demand is critically important to
planning and meeting the associated infrastructure needs and institutional
changes necessary to ensure that safe, secure, and efficient movement of
our Nation's goods to the ultimate consignees and destinations across the
Nation.
(6) International gateway and intermodal trade corridor freight infrastructure
movement, research, project planning, investment, and financing must be
a priority in this Act.
(7) Critical intermodal freight projects with national and regional economic
significance, but with associated local impacts, are often difficult to
shepherd, achieve consensus support, and fund through the current metropolitan
planning process.
(8) The importance of safe, secure, and efficient goods movement to the
health and welfare of the national economy should recognized by the establishment
of a goods movement program.
SEC. 3. GOODS MOVEMENT PROGRAM.
(a) IN GENERAL- Subchapter 1 of chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 165. Goods movement program
`(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSES-
`(1) ESTABLISHMENT- The Secretary shall establish a goods movement program
to improve the productivity, security, and safety of freight transportation
gateways, while mitigating congestion and community impacts in the area
of such gateways.
`(2) PURPOSES- The purposes of the goods movement program shall be--
`(A) to facilitate and support multimodal freight transportation initiatives
at the State, regional, and local levels in order to improve freight transportation
gateways and mitigate congestion in the area of such gateways;
`(B) to provide capital funding to address infrastructure and freight
operational needs at freight transportation corridors and gateways;
`(C) to encourage adoption of new financing strategies to leverage State,
local, and private investment in freight transportation gateways; and
`(D) to support military mobilization and readiness.
`(1) IN GENERAL- Intermodal freight transportation projects that provide
community and highway benefits by addressing economic, congestion, security,
safety, and environmental issues associated with freight transportation
corridors and gateways shall be eligible for funding under this section.
`(2) TYPES OF PROJECTS- Projects eligible for funding under paragraph (1)
shall be limited to the following:
`(A) Projects to facilitate access to intermodal freight transfer facilities.
`(i) National Highway System routes connecting to intermodal freight
terminals identified according to criteria set forth in the report to
Congress entitled `Pulling Together: The National Highway System and
its Connections to Major Intermodal Terminals', dated May 24, 1996,
and any modifications to these connections consistent with subparagraph
(D); and
`(ii) the Strategic Highway Network (commonly known as `STRAHNET'),
including connectors to strategic military deployment ports.
`(C) Projects on high priority corridors identified in section 1105(c)
of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032).
`(D) Projects to separate railroad and road crossings and make other railroad
and road interface improvements.
`(c) SELECTION CRITERIA- In selecting projects under the goods movement program,
the Secretary shall give priority to a project that exhibits the following
criteria:
`(1) Enhances national, regional, and local economies by allowing for economic
development and growth, as measured by--
`(A) impact on the Nation's gross domestic product;
`(B) increases in new businesses and jobs;
`(C) State and local tax receipts;
`(D) changes in prices and manufacturing efficiencies; and
`(E) improved safety as measured by reductions in accidents, injuries,
and fatalities.
`(2) Seeks to maximize economic opportunities for communities, including
increasing local hiring.
`(3) Considers factors such as improved mobility, congestion relief, energy
consumption, air pollution, and noise pollution.
`(4) Demonstrates availability of local resources to augment the transportation
infrastructure.
`(5) Leverages incremental funding as measured by non-Federal, public and
private investment projects, and uses innovative financing and local funding
and financing by attracting local public and private investment.
`(6) Integrates and deploys intelligent transportation technologies.
`(7) Encourages and facilitates regional partnerships to develop high priority
corridors identified in section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991.
`(8) Encourages or facilitates major multistate or regional mobility and
economic growth and development in areas underserved by existing highway
infrastructure.
`(9) Reduces commercial and other travel time through a major national gateway
or affected port of entry expected as a result of the proposed project including
the level of traffic delays at at-grade highway crossings of major rail
lines in trade corridors.
`(A) GRANTS- The Secretary may make grants under the goods movement program
to assist State and local governmental authorities in financing--
`(i) capital projects, including property and improvements;
`(ii) the capital costs of coordinating projects under the program with
other transportation modes;
`(iii) the introduction of new technology, through innovative and improved
products, into projects under the program;
`(iv) capital projects to modernize existing corridors and gateways;
and
`(v) the development of corridors to support and expand the safe, secure,
and efficient movement of goods, including protecting rights of way
through acquisition, construction of dedicated truck and high occupancy
vehicle lanes and other nonvehicular capital improvements that the Secretary
may decide would result in mitigating congestion in such corridors.
`(B) TERMS AND CONDITIONS- The Secretary shall require that all grants
under the goods movement program be subject to all terms, conditions,
requirements, and provisions the Secretary decides are necessary or appropriate
for the purposes of this section, including requirements for the disposition
of net increases in the value of real property resulting from the project
assisted under the program.
`(2) PROJECT AS PART OF APPROVED PROGRAM OF PROJECTS- Except as provided
in paragraph (3), the Secretary may approve a grant for a project under
the goods movement program only after finding that the project is part of
the approved program of projects required under sections 134 and 135 and
that an applicant--
`(A) has or will have the legal, financial, and technical capacity to
carry out the project, satisfactory continuing control over the use of
equipment or facilities (excluding equipment and facilities owned by railroads),
and the capability to maintain the equipment or facilities; and
`(B) will maintain the equipment or facilities.
`(3) CRITERIA FOR GRANTS-
`(A) IN GENERAL- The Secretary may approve a grant under this section
for a project under the goods movement program only if the Secretary determines
that the proposed project is--
`(i) based on the results of an alternatives analysis and preliminary
engineering;
`(ii) justified based on a comprehensive review of its mobility improvements,
environmental benefits, cost effectiveness, and operating efficiencies;
and
`(iii) supported by an acceptable degree of local financial commitment,
including evidence of stable and dependable financing sources to construct,
maintain, and operate the system or extension.
`(B) CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLANS- The Secretary shall not
require an applicant for a grant under this section for a project to undertake
activities to demonstrate that the project complies with the requirements
of subparagraph (A) to the extent that the Secretary can make a determination
under subparagraph (A) based on a corridor development and management
plan developed under section 1118(d) of the Transportation Equity Act
for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 162) and any other studies and materials
developed for the project under that section.
`(C) ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING- In evaluating
a project under subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall analyze and consider
the results of the alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering for
the project.
`(D) PROJECT JUSTIFICATION- In evaluating a project, the Secretary shall
give priority consideration to a project that exhibits the criteria established
in subsection (c).
`(E) LOCAL FINANCIAL COMMITMENT-
`(i) EVALUATION OF PROJECT- In evaluating a project under subparagraph
(A)(iii), the Secretary shall require that--
`(I) the proposed project plan provides for the availability of contingency
amounts that the Secretary determines to be reasonable to cover unanticipated
cost increases; and
`(II) each proposed local source of capital and operating financing
is stable, reliable, and available within the proposed project timetable.
`(ii) CONSIDERATIONS- In assessing the stability, reliability, and availability
of proposed sources of local financing under clause (i), the Secretary
shall consider--
`(I) existing grant commitments;
`(II) the degree to which financing sources are dedicated to the purposes
proposed;
`(III) any debt obligation that exists or is proposed by the recipient
for the proposed project; and
`(IV) the extent to which the project has a local financial commitment
that exceeds the required non-Federal share of the cost of the project.
`(F) REGULATIONS- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment
of this section, the Secretary shall issue regulations on the manner in
which the Secretary will evaluate and rate the projects based on the results
of alternatives analysis, project justification, and the degree of local
financial commitment, as required under this paragraph.
`(G) PROJECT EVALUATION AND RATING- A proposed project may advance from
alternatives analysis to preliminary engineering, and may advance from
preliminary engineering to final design and construction, only if the
Secretary finds that the project meets the requirements of this subsection
and there is a reasonable likelihood that the project will continue to
meet such requirements. In making such findings, the Secretary shall evaluate
and rate the project as `highly recommended', `recommended', or `not recommended',
based on the results of alternatives analysis, the project justification
criteria, and the degree of local financial commitment, as required under
this paragraph. In rating the projects, the Secretary shall provide, in
addition to the overall project rating, individual ratings for each of
the criteria established under the regulations issued under subparagraph
(F).
`(H) FULL FUNDING GRANT AGREEMENT- A project financed under this subsection
shall be carried out through a full funding grant agreement. The Secretary
shall enter into a full funding grant agreement based on the evaluations
and ratings required under this subsection. The Secretary shall not enter
into a full funding grant agreement for a project unless that project
is authorized for final design and construction.
`(4) FULL FUNDING GRANT AGREEMENTS AND EARLY SYSTEMS WORK AGREEMENTS-
`(A) FULL FUNDING GRANT AGREEMENTS-
`(i) IN GENERAL- The Secretary may make a full funding grant agreement
with an applicant. The agreement shall--
`(I) establish the terms of participation by the United States Government
in a project under this subsection;
(II) establish the maximum amount of Government financial assistance
for the project;
(III) cover the period of time for completing the project, including
a period extending beyond the period of an authorization; and
(IV) make timely and efficient management of the project easier according
to the law of the United States.
`(ii) OBLIGATION OF AMOUNTS- An agreement under this subparagraph obligates
an amount of available budget authority specified in law and may include
a commitment, contingent on amounts to be specified in law in advance
for commitments under this subparagraph, to obligate an additional amount
from future available budget authority specified in law. The agreement
shall state that the contingent commitment is not an obligation of the
Government. Interest and other financing costs of efficiently carrying
out a part of the project within a reasonable time are a cost of carrying
out the project under a full funding grant agreement, except that eligible
costs may not be more than the cost of the most favorable financing
terms reasonably available for the project at the time of borrowing.
The applicant shall certify, in a way satisfactory to the Secretary,
that the applicant has shown reasonable diligence in seeking the most
favorable financing terms. The amount stipulated in an agreement under
this subparagraph for a project shall be sufficient to complete at least
an operable segment.
`(B) EARLY SYSTEMS WORK AGREEMENTS-
`(i) IN GENERAL- The Secretary may make an early systems work agreement
with an applicant if a record of decision under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) has been issued on the project
and the Secretary finds there is reason to believe--
`(I) a full funding grant agreement for the project will be made;
and
`(II) the terms of the work agreement will promote ultimate completion
of the project more rapidly and at less cost.
`(ii) OBLIGATION OF AMOUNTS- A work agreement under this subparagraph
obligates an amount of available budget authority specified in law and
shall provide for reimbursement of preliminary costs of carrying out
the project, including land acquisition, timely procurement of system
elements for which specifications are decided, and other activities
the Secretary decides are appropriate to make efficient, long-term project
management easier. A work agreement shall cover the period of time the
Secretary considers appropriate. The period may extend beyond the period
of current authorization. Interest and other financing costs of efficiently
carrying out the work agreement within a reasonable time are a cost
of carrying out the agreement, except that eligible costs may not be
more than the cost of the most favorable financing terms reasonably
available for the project at the time of borrowing. The applicant shall
certify, in a way satisfactory to the Secretary, that the applicant
has shown reasonable diligence in seeking the most favorable financing
terms. If an applicant does not carry out the project for reasons within
the control of the applicant, the applicant shall repay all Government
payments made under the work agreement plus reasonable interest and
penalty charges the Secretary establishes in the agreement.
`(C) TOTAL OF FUTURE OBLIGATIONS- The total estimated amount of future
obligations of the Government and contingent commitments to incur obligations
covered by all outstanding letters of intent, full funding grant agreements,
and early systems work agreements may be not more than the greater of
the amount authorized to carry out this section, less an amount the Secretary
reasonably estimates is necessary for grants under this subsection not
covered by a letter. The total amount covered by new letters and contingent
commitments included in full funding grant agreements and early systems
work agreements may be not more than a limitation specified in law.
`(5) GOVERNMENT'S SHARE OF NET PROJECT COST- Based on engineering studies,
studies of economic feasibility, and information on the expected use of
equipment or facilities, the Secretary shall estimate the net project cost.
A grant for the project is for 80 percent of the net project cost, unless
the grant recipient requests a lower grant percentage.
The remainder shall be provided in cash from a source other than amounts
of the Government. Amounts that make up the remainder must be from an undistributed
cash surplus, a replacement or depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital.
A refund or reduction of the remainder may be made only if a refund of a proportional
amount of the grant of the Government is made at the same time.
`(6) FINANCIAL PLAN- A recipient of Federal financial assistance for a project
under this section with an estimated total cost of $100,000,000 or more
shall submit to the Secretary an annual financial plan for the project.
The plan shall be based on detailed annual estimates of the cost to complete
the remaining elements of the project and on reasonable assumptions, as
determined by the Secretary, of future increases in the cost to complete
the project.
`(7) FISCAL CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS- If the Secretary gives priority consideration
to financing projects that include more than the non-Government share required
under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall give equal consideration to differences
in the fiscal capacity of State and local governments.
`(8) UNDERTAKING PROJECTS IN ADVANCE- The Secretary may pay the Government's
share of the net project costs to a State or local governmental authority
that carries out any part of a project described in this subsection without
the aid of amounts of the Government and according to all applicable procedures
and requirements if--
`(A) the State or local governmental authority applies for the payment;
`(B) the Secretary approves the payment; and
`(C) before carrying out the part of the project, the Secretary approves
the plans and specifications for the part in the same way as other projects
under the goods movement program.
`(9) REPORTS- Not later than the first Monday in February of each year,
the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report that includes a proposal
on the allocation of amounts to be made available to finance grants for
capital projects under the goods movement program for those amounts.
`(e) SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, Congress
deems the following to be projects of national economic significance: [To
Be Supplied].
`(2) REPORTS- Not later than October 1, 2005, and October 1, 2007, project
recipients under this section shall submit to the Secretary and the Congress
a report enumerating the national economic significance of the project.
`(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS-
`(1) IN GENERAL- There is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway
Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) to carry out this section
$3,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2009. Of such amount,
$1,500,000,000 per fiscal year shall be available only for carrying out
projects designated under subsection (e).
`(2) ALLOCATION OF AMOUNTS- Not to exceed 8 percent of the amounts made
available to carry out this section in a fiscal year may be used for planning,
design, preliminary engineering, and projects with a total cost of less
than $25,000,000.
`(g) CONTRACT AUTHORITY- Sums authorized to be appropriated to carry out this
section shall be available for obligation in the same manner as funds apportioned
under section 104(b)(1), except that such amounts shall not be counted toward
a State's allocation under section 105 and shall not be subject to any obligation
limitation.'.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- The analysis for subchapter I of chapter I of such
title is amended by adding at the end the following:
`165. Goods movement program.'.
(c) REPEAL- Section 1118 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(23 U.S.C. 101 note; 112 Stat. 161) is repealed.
END